Problems of unification of the functioning of approved terms (based on textbooks, dictionaries and legislative documents)
Views: 300 / PDF downloads: 155
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2025-150-1-112-129Keywords:
terminology, school terminology, unification, dictionary, Term Committee, legislationAbstract
The article is devoted to the comparison of some terms used in school textbooks, terminological explanatory and industry dictionaries with the variants approved by the Republican Terminological Commission (hereinafter – the Term Committee), and their application in legislation, as well as the application of some terms approved by the Term Committee. As a result of the study, the following points were identified on the use of some terms in school textbooks: the variants of terms approved by the Term Committee were not used; the same term is given a different definition in each class; there are also long, incorrectly formed definitions that do not take into account the age of students; finally, one term is assigned a different definition. The following points have been identified on the use of certain terms in terminological explanatory and industry dictionaries: The Term Committee has approved different versions of the same term in different years; terms in several industry dictionaries have been translated in different versions; several doublet versions of the same term are found in dictionaries; some terms are not used in legislation; some terms are not approved by the Term Committee.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Here is the academic English version suitable for publication on the journal website:
The academic journal “Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Philology Series” adheres to an Open Access policy for all published materials, based on the principle of free and equitable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The Editorial Board believes that open access to research results contributes to the advancement of philological science, strengthens academic communication, and promotes the integration of national research into the international scientific community.
1. Free and Open Access
All articles published in the journal are made openly available on the official website of the journal and are accessible to all users without restrictions, registration, or payment.
Users are entitled to:
-
freely read and download materials;
-
copy and distribute the texts of publications;
-
print articles;
-
use materials for scientific and educational purposes, provided that proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the original source of publication.
2. Licensing
Journal materials are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This license permits the use, copying, distribution, and adaptation of the materials for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and a link to the original publication is included.
3. Benefits of Open Access
The Open Access policy ensures:
-
increased visibility and citation of scholarly publications;
-
prompt dissemination of research findings in the fields of philology, linguistics, literary studies, and translation studies;
-
expansion of international academic cooperation;
-
access for readers to up-to-date scientific information without financial or technical barriers.
The Editorial Board is committed to ensuring transparency in editorial processes, maintaining high standards of peer review, and providing broad accessibility to research outcomes in the field of philological studies.
