The cognitive and pragmatic model of the English language-based research article macrostructure
Views: 177 / PDF downloads: 81
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2018-125-4-25-41Keywords:
empirical article, macro-structure, cognitive and pragmatic model, structuring, moveAbstract
Having an article published in the high index citation journals turns to be a considerable
challenge for professional researchers, as well as novices writers. Writing such an article supposes not
only deep awareness of the topic of investigation but also adequate skills to present the results in the form
following the conventions in the English language academic culture. These canons include the abilities to
structure a text according the its communicative and pragmatic purposes as well as semantic information,
presented in the conventional sections of Introduction-Methodology-Result-Discussion (IMRD). This
paper aims to show how IMRD is realized in 60 research articles from the high impact factor Humanities
journals whose authors are experts in the academic discourse, genre and text studies. The main method is
the quantitative analysis of the articles which contributed to the identification of most frequent models of the
textual macrostructure, such as Abstract-Introduction-(Other Heading)-Methodology-Results-DiscussionConclusion и Abstract–Introduction-Methodology-(Results & Discussion)-Conclusion. Besides, the
qualitative discursive analysis of the articles also enabled to distinguish the text fragments that clearly show
the communicative purpose of an article section. The findings demonstrate that structuring a text is deeply
cognitive as it includes knowledge of discipline, text organization and readers’ expectations. Structuring
a text is also pragmatic because aims to convincingly present the research and have the perlocutionary
effect from recipients. In this connection, this paper highlights the cognitive and pragmatic model of the
macrostructure of the analyzed articles. The results of the investigation can be helpful for novice writers
of empirical articles
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Here is the academic English version suitable for publication on the journal website:
The academic journal “Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Philology Series” adheres to an Open Access policy for all published materials, based on the principle of free and equitable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The Editorial Board believes that open access to research results contributes to the advancement of philological science, strengthens academic communication, and promotes the integration of national research into the international scientific community.
1. Free and Open Access
All articles published in the journal are made openly available on the official website of the journal and are accessible to all users without restrictions, registration, or payment.
Users are entitled to:
-
freely read and download materials;
-
copy and distribute the texts of publications;
-
print articles;
-
use materials for scientific and educational purposes, provided that proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the original source of publication.
2. Licensing
Journal materials are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This license permits the use, copying, distribution, and adaptation of the materials for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and a link to the original publication is included.
3. Benefits of Open Access
The Open Access policy ensures:
-
increased visibility and citation of scholarly publications;
-
prompt dissemination of research findings in the fields of philology, linguistics, literary studies, and translation studies;
-
expansion of international academic cooperation;
-
access for readers to up-to-date scientific information without financial or technical barriers.
The Editorial Board is committed to ensuring transparency in editorial processes, maintaining high standards of peer review, and providing broad accessibility to research outcomes in the field of philological studies.





